Ethical and Effective Legal
Representation
775-322-3666
Maddox, Segerblom & Canepa

Washoe lawsuit alleges state broke medical pot shop law

A lawsuit filed in Washoe County alleges the state of Nevada failed to follow its own law ranking businesses for medical marijuana dispensary licenses.

The plaintiff in the complaint, Washoe Dispensary, LLC., argues the state’s ranking system awarded two licenses to Tryke Companies Reno LLC in Sparks and unincorporated Washoe County, which breaks the Nevada law limiting one business no more than 10 percent of the licenses in any jurisdiction.

Washoe County was given 10 dispensaries: three in Reno; two in Sparks and five in unincorporated Washoe County. According to the plaintiff’s argument, that means Tryke will get 20 percent of the dispensary licenses.

The law was written in order “to prevent monopolistic practices” in counties with more than 100,000 people.

Additionally, the lawsuit alleges the state failed to give local governments the ultimate decision on licensing, specifically because three of the five dispensary licenses for unincorporated Washoe County were issued in Incline Village and Crystal Bay near Lake Tahoe.

“Setting up three dispensaries in Incline Village/Crystal Bay is ridiculous,” said Shane Smith, a partner in Washoe Dispensary.

“Having three dispensaries in such close proximity to each other, and to the California state line, seems to indicate the state was either oblivious or catering to the idea of building a medical tourism industry at Tahoe centered around medical marijuana,” Smith said.

Calls to the state’s Medical Marijuana Establishment program were not returned Tuesday. Assistant County Manager Kevin Schiller declined public comment on the lawsuit.

Ardea Canepa, attorney for Washoe Dispensary, said the county should wait on issuing the licenses.

“They should step back and realize the 10-percent rule is being violated and having three dispensaries in Incline Village and one in Galena is not the best thing for the community or for purposes of patient access,” Canepa said.

Washoe Dispensary filed for a license in Washoe Valley, Canepa said.

A hearing has not been scheduled concerning the complaint, she said.

Brett Scolari, the attorney for Tryke Companies, said he hasn’t read the complaint yet and declined public comment on it.

“We have a provisional certificate and we have to move forward in an 18-month span,” he said.

The lawsuit comes one week after Nevada State Sen. Tick Segerblom, D-Las Vegas, says he intends to push a bill in the Legislature that starts next month that would allow counties and cities a one-time increase in the number of dispensaries allowed in a jurisdiction and increased autonomy in distributing licenses.

“They would have flexibility to pick anyone the state has ranked,” he said. “They don’t have to get it approved by the state.”

The proposed legislation would locate dispensaries based on a jurisdiction’s population, which would give Reno more than the three it currently has, Segerblom said.

Nevada legalized the distribution of marijuana for medical purposes in 2013. The state released its rankings of businesses for dispensary licenses in November.

Legal disputes in Southern Nevada continue after the Division of Public and Behavioral Health endorsed only 10 of the Clark County’s 18 picks in June. Washoe County did not rank businesses before the state’s rankings.

Visit the news link here.

What Our Clients Say

My family and I are thankful to Maddox, Segerblom and Canepa for their assistance during a three year case regarding construction defects to our home. We are truly appreciative of their knowledge, determination and assistance during this process. They were always courteous, and available to answer any and all of our concerns and questions. Thank you for the wonderful resolution. Many thanks to you and your staff.

Frances Castelli

We used Maddox, Segerblom & Canepa to represent us in a legal suit re problems in construction on new properties that we purchased from a developer.

We were very pleased with the representation provided by this law firm. They were fully communicative, responsive to our questions and were very knowledgeable about the issues that required resolution. Even after we reached a resolution, they have been responsive in making sure to point us in the right direction for help with repairs that are required.

We would recommend them to others with similar issues that require legal help.

Atam & Margo Lalchandani

Maddox, Segerblom & Canepa did a FANTASTIC job in our construction defects case. I interacted with several people from their office throughout our 2 year litigation. Their staff is friendly, knowledgeable and always prompt about getting back to you when you have questions/comments/concerns. I especially enjoyed working with Darcy, Ardea, Eva, and Sandra. Being part of a lawsuit is no fun for anyone, but if you have to be a part of one, I can’t say enough positive things about this firm!

Victoria Fox

The law firm of Maddox, Segerblom, and Canepa were amazing to work with. They were thorough and always available for any questions we had. We worked a lot with Sandy who was always professional, friendly, always on time for appointments and just a great person to represent this firm. We have never been involved in a law suit before and they made it comfortable for us. We appreciate the hard work the lawyers and people who work for the firm did and would recommend them.

Becky Loudenburg
GET EXCLUSIVE LEGAL NEWS
Receive our free eNewsletter with the latest legal news.